DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
| JET
Docket No. NR1325-14
16 Jun 14
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 16 June 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N32 of 15 Apr
14, a copy of which is attached.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
A review of your electronic service record reveaied that upon
entry into the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) and prior to you
entering active duty, you were advanced to E-2 for having
completed two years of Junior ROTC (JROTC) Program. Your
application claims that the Recruiter did not document the
completion of your Junior ROTC Leadership Challenge Camp,
warranting advancement to E-3. However, the Board agreed with
the advisory opinion that there was no evidence found to
indicate that you had completed three years of JROTC as is
required for advancement to E-3. Furthermore, completion of the
JROTC Challenge Camp in and of itself does not warrant
advancement to E-3. Accordingly, your application has been
Docket No. NR1325-14
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
thaterial evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
navai record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT D. 4SALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure: CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N32 of 15 Apr 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8536 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N32 of 6 May 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the,zburden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04999-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum which is attached. #an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR949 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 September 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docker Na WNRONG49-14 naval record, the “an is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2433 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval ,record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09355-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFERExecutive DirectorEnclosure IN I - I1133 Ser N32/ NOV 26 2007 From: Commander, Navy...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00141-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error r injustice. This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2777 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting-in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N3 of 14 Apr 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, *the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08558-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NRC letter 1133 Ser N32/ of 20 October 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10728-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. It is our opinion that in this case the petitioner has a misunderstanding as to how the NCF benefit is calculated.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09026-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC 1133 Ser N53l2/09056 of 2 Jun 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...